EMPOWERING CONSUMER PROTECTION RIGHTS IN INDIA: JUMP FROM 1986 TO 2019
"Instead of gutting
consumer protection, we should be expanding it."
~ Hillary Clinton
Introduction
With
the acknowledgment of several consumer rights established in the Consumer
Protection Act, 1986 (“old Act”), India has long given preference to Caveat
Venditor (Seller Beware) over the ancient principle of Caveat Emptor (Buyer
Beware). The environment of consumer rights and transactions has shifted
dramatically in recent years, necessitating the adoption of novel legal
provisions to acknowledge the rights and remedies accessible to consumers.
A
new era of commerce and digital branding, as well as a new set of customer
expectations, has arrived with the Digital Age. Easy access, a wide range of
options, efficient payment mechanisms, improved services, and buying at one's
leisure have all been made possible by digitization. However, as the company
grew, it faced issues connected to consumer protection.
With
this in mind, and in order to address the new set of challenges that consumers
face in the digital age, the Indian Parliament passed the landmark Consumer
Protection Bill, 2019 on August 6, 2019, which aims to provide for the timely
and effective administration and resolution of consumer disputes. The President
of India gave his assent to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (New Act), which
was published in the official gazette on August 9, 2019. The New Act will take
effect on the date that the Central Government specifies. The New Act aims to
replace the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, which is more than three decades
old (Act).
Limitations to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Despite
having specific measures to protect consumers from unfair trade practices
and other types of violations of consumer rights, the Act failed to regulate
certain wrongs perpetrated against them. The problem of product responsibility
was one among them. Allegations of excessive lead concentration in Maggie
noodles, as well as flaws in Volkswagen cars, are just a few examples of events
that have generated concerns about the ineffectiveness of legislation in
avoiding such incidents. Because defects in products such as food can cause
‘harm' to customers, it was considered that a strict and deterrent legal
process should be in place to hold manufacturers, distributors, and others
responsible.
Another
legal issue that needed to be addressed was celebrities supporting goods
through commercials, influencing and, in some cases, misleading consumers in
their purchasing decisions. Both celebrities and advertisers must be aware of
the influence and power of advertising in order to make responsible claims to
sell products or services.'[1]
False
and misleading advertisements infringe on a number of consumer rights,
including the right to information, the freedom to choose, the right to be
protected against harmful goods and services, and the right to be free from
unfair trade practices.[2]
In March 2019, the ASCI's Consumer Complaints Council in Mumbai had assessed
344 advertising and upheld complaints against 229 deceptive commercials.[3]
The Keynotes to the Consumer Protection Act,
2019
▪
E-Commerce: The New Act has
broadened the definition of "consumer." Any person who purchases
things, whether through offline or online transactions, electronic means,
teleshopping, direct selling, or multi-level marketing, is now included in the
definition. The previous Act did not directly cover e-commerce transactions,
but the New Act fills in that gap.[4]
▪
Establishment of the
Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA): The New Act proposes
the creation of a regulatory agency known as the Central Consumer Protection
Authority (CCPA) with broad enforcement powers. The CCPA will have an
investigation wing, led by a Director-General, that will be able to conduct
inquiries and investigations into infractions of consumer laws. If a consumer
complaint affects more than one (one) individual, the CCPA has been given broad
authority to take suo moto steps, recall items, force repayment of the price of
goods/services, cancel licenses, and initiate class
action litigation.
▪
Pecuniary Jurisdiction
Shift: Previously, the District Forum had the jurisdiction to decide on
items with a value of less than Rs. 20 lakh. This has now been amended to
include only matters with a value of less than one crore rupees. Similarly,
under the old Act, it mattered worth more than Rs. 20
lakhs but less than Rs. 1 crore, but under the new Act, it is matters worth
more than Rs. 1 crore but less than Rs. 10 crores. Furthermore, the National Commission, which previously had the
authority to hear cases worth more than Rs. 1 crore under the old Act, now
hears cases worth more than Rs. 10 crores under the new Act.[5]
▪
Product Liability and
Penal Consequences: The New Act introduces the notion of product
liability and makes the product producer, product service provider, and product
seller liable for any compensation claim. The word "product seller"
is defined as "any person involved in placing a product for a commercial
purpose," which would include e-commerce platforms. The defense
that e-commerce platforms are only "platforms" or
"aggregators" will be rejected. Manufacturers have greater legal
risks than product service providers and dealers because, under the New Act,
manufacturers will be responsible for product
liability actions even if they can show that they were not negligent or
dishonest in making an express claim. Under the New Act, there are some
exceptions to liability claims, such as the product seller not being liable if
the product has been mistreated, altered, or modified.[6]
▪
Penalties for False or
Misleading Advertising: The CCPA can fine a
manufacturer or endorser up to INR 1,000,000 (Indian Rupees One Million) for
making a false or misleading advertisement. For the same, the CCPA may sentence
them to up to 2 (two) years in prison. A third offense might result in a fine of up to INR 5,000,000 (Indian
Rupees Five Million) and a sentence of up to 5 (five) years in jail. The CCPA
also has the power to bar an endorsement of a deceptive advertisement from endorsing
that product or service for a period of up to one year. The duration of
restriction may be extended to 3 (three) years for each successive offense.[7]
▪
E-filing of Complaints: The New Act gives
consumers the option of filing complaints with the jurisdictional consumer
forum closest to their home or place of business. Unlike the present practice
of submitting it at the point of purchase or where the seller's registered
office is located, this is a new practice. The
New Act also includes provisions that allow consumers to register complaints
electronically and conduct hearings and/or examinations through
videoconference. This is done to make the process easier for consumers and to
eliminate inconvenience and harassment.[8]
▪
Mediation as an
Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism: The New Act includes
mediation as an Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism, making the dispute
resolution process easier and faster. This will assist to speed up the
resolution of disputes and relieve pressure on consumer courts, which currently
have a backlog of cases.[9]
Conclusion
As
can be seen, CPA 2019 differs from CPA 1986 in a number of ways. The Consumer
Protection Act of 2019 (CPA 2019) has broadened the scope of India's consumer
protection regime. The modifications introduced by CPA 2019 appear to further
empower consumers by putting more responsibility on their counterparts, such as
sellers, manufacturers, and service providers, as well as product endorsers. It
also tries to address concerns that were not fully addressed by CPA 1986, such
as consumer interests as a class, and so forth.
By
raising the pecuniary jurisdiction of the commissions, attaching mediation
cells, increasing the number of members of the commissions, imposing greater
penalties, and so on, CPA 2019 aims to make the process of resolving consumer
disputes easier and faster. Because several new concepts have been proposed,
the effects of CPA 2019 cannot be predicted in advance. What can be said with
certainty, however, is that everyone participating in a transaction, aside from
the consumer, will have to be more attentive and cautious than ever before.
[1] Ratna Bhushan, ‘Advertising Standards Council of
India Issues Guidelines on Celebrity Advertising’ (Economic Times Bureau, 14,
April 2017) <
https>
accessed June 7, 2021 [17:09]
[2] Pushpa Girimaji,
Misleading Advertisements and Consumer (Consumer Education Monograph Series 2,
Centre for Consumer Studies Indian Institute Of Public Administration, 2013)
[3] ‘ASCI Upholds
Complaints Against 229 Misleading Advertisements’ Economic Times (Mumbai, 22
May 2019) <
https>
accessed on June 7, 2021 [17:34]
[4]Dhruv Malik (Principal Associate, Juris Corp), Hafeez
Patanwala (Associate) – ‘Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – A New Challenge to
Indian Businesses?’ Law Street India (August 17, 2020)
accessed on June
7, 2021 [19:52]
[5] PDS Legal
Advocates & Solicitors ‘India: The
Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Key Features and Highlights’ (June 25, 2020)
accessed on June 8, 2021 [00:41]
[6] Aanchal M. Nichani ‘The Consumer Protection Act’
Lexology (July 27, 2020)
[7] Department of Consumer Affair
[8] Ibid 7
[9] Supra 4