The Constitutional Balance: Parliament's Role and the Supreme Court's Judgments in India

The Constitutional Balance: Parliament's Role and the Supreme Court's Judgments in India

In the democratic fabric of India, the roles of various institutions are meticulously defined to ensure a system of checks and balances. Among these, the Parliament and the Supreme Court hold paramount significance, each vested with distinct powers to uphold the rule of law and protect citizens' rights. However, a fundamental tenet of this framework is the independence of the judiciary, ensuring that its decisions are final and binding. Here lies the essence of why Parliament cannot overturn the judgments of the Supreme Court of India.

Judicial review stands as a cornerstone of modern democratic governance, embodying the principle of checks and balances. It is a mechanism through which courts scrutinize the legality and constitutionality of governmental actions, ensuring adherence to the fundamental principles enshrined in the constitution. This article delves into the essence of judicial review, its historical evolution, significance in contemporary democracies, and its role in safeguarding the rule of law and constitutionalism.

The Constitution of India delineates the powers and functions of the Parliament and the Supreme Court separately, ensuring the independence of both institutions. While the Parliament enacts laws and represents the will of the people, the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution and adjudicates disputes, serving as the guardian of justice. This separation of powers is crucial in maintaining the delicate balance of authority and preventing any single entity from wielding excessive influence.

At its core, judicial review involves the examination of legislative and executive actions to ensure their conformity with constitutional provisions. It serves as a mechanism to prevent governmental overreach, protect individual rights, and uphold the rule of law. Through judicial review, courts interpret the constitution, resolve conflicts between branches of government, and hold public authorities accountable for their actions.

The principle of judicial independence, enshrined in the Constitution, guarantees that the judiciary can function free from external pressures or interference. The Supreme Court, as the apex judicial body, exercises its authority to interpret the Constitution and review the legality of laws and governmental actions. Its judgments are binding on all lower courts and government bodies, establishing a uniform application of law throughout the country.

The doctrine of judicial review empowers the Supreme Court to invalidate any law or executive action that contravenes the Constitution. This power serves as a bulwark against legislative or executive overreach, ensuring that the rights and liberties enshrined in the Constitution are protected. By upholding the supremacy of the Constitution, the Supreme Court acts as the final arbiter of legal disputes, embodying the rule of law in the Indian democracy.

In contrast, the Parliament, while vested with legislative authority, operates within the framework established by the Constitution. Its powers are not absolute and are subject to the Constitution's provisions, including the principles of fundamental rights and separation of powers. While Parliament can amend existing laws or enact new ones, it cannot pass legislation that violates the Constitution or undermines the judiciary's independence.

The doctrine of separation of powers dictates that Parliament cannot encroach upon the domain of the judiciary or seek to overturn its judgments. Any attempt to subvert the Supreme Court's decisions would undermine the foundational principles of democracy and rule of law. Moreover, such actions would erode public trust in the judiciary and weaken the constitutional fabric of the nation.

It is essential to recognize that the relationship between Parliament and the Supreme Court is one of mutual respect and collaboration within their respective spheres of influence. While Parliament formulates laws to address societal needs, the Supreme Court ensures that these laws adhere to constitutional principles and safeguard citizens' rights. This complementary relationship underscores the strength of India's democratic institutions and their commitment to upholding constitutional values.

In conclusion, the notion that Parliament can overturn the judgments of the Supreme Court is antithetical to the principles of constitutionalism and judicial independence. The separation of powers, coupled with the supremacy of the Constitution, establishes the Supreme Court as the final authority on legal matters. Upholding the integrity of the judiciary is paramount to preserving the rule of law and ensuring justice for all citizens.

Share this articles : Whatsapp Facebook Twitter Linkedin